Goal of the day: 636 words. Written: 243.
Let's clear up the most obvious first. So that you are not tempted to imagine nonsense. Who are women? Women are people. And I fully believe that.
…But when I see movements that create “women-safe” or “spiritually feminine” communities, I cannot stay silent.
Fighting for equal pay is a good thing.
The fight for toilets of the same size - as well.
Like the fight to make baby development rooms available to men too.
But whatever, excuse the expression, too chuinia, there is projects like Safr?
Safr is a female-only equivalent of the Uber taxi service. What's not bad - go ahead, closed clubs are not bad at all.
…Just why is Safr presented as “The Safe Way to Travel for Women”?
Does it say, "By choosing Safr, you'll be helping a sister"?
I find it a bit strange.
Because…
"A Project for Women" is the same as "A Project for Blacks."
Notice the similarity?
Equality is a good reason to fight. Equality is what I believe in.
...Just why instead of equality, separate community ghettos are being created here? A safe zone for poor women, a safe zone for poor punks, a safe zone for so-and-so, we'll protect them so they don't have to worry.
If you want equality, fight for it. Fight for an Uber that is safe for everyone, not just you, fight for healthy food for the whole country, not just for your family.
Making wars and measuring pimples will not create equality. In this way, you will only create ghettos who believe in their own mythology, for whom everyone who is not with them is an enemy, and everyone who is with them is no less untrustworthy.
Why do you think the myth arose in Lithuania that vegans are extremely aggressive? And after all, someone who started the first vegan groups carried out ethnic cleansing of ideas, and despised and humiliated those who did not understand and doubted.
Humiliating will not build a community. You will only create "safe" prisons.
man
Daniel