What is the difference between an expert and a person who is otherwise knowledgeable? The expert is likely to have his own not only verified, but also created<\/strong> way of thinking.<\/p>\n For example:<\/p>\n In any case, a knowledgeable person will simply share his experience, and a knowledgeable person will put that experience into his own unique recipe.<\/p>\n All pancakes are basically the same (at least in shape). All methods of time management, SEO or self-love are basically similar (probably a time management method will help you manage your time). You can cling to probably any technique and say "this one is similar". Originality does not exist in a vacuum.<\/p>\n And an expert can become famous with his technique. Perhaps his technique will be named after him. Perhaps outsiders will say that other methods are copied from this one. What was "created" first?<\/p>\n However, if you want to be an expert:\u00a0don't be afraid to create your own methods.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Any "brand" is a great hook to help you stand out from the crowd. There are a lot of knowledgeable people, but fewer experts who also have their own unique method to share.<\/p>\n What is your work technology? What works for you? Give it a name, tell us how you do it - become an expert in the field.<\/p>\n (Note:<\/strong> inventing a method does not make you an infallible expert. You can still be wrong, and your method may not work. But I'm talking about a way of thinking, not a mystical "step". Experts think of their methods and share them (they experiment<\/a>)<\/strong>, and otherwise those who know only copy.)<\/p>\n\n
I must note here - "exclusive" is a debatable word.<\/h2>\n
Because methods are remembered and sold.<\/h2>\n
\n