{"id":7153,"date":"2016-02-15T14:40:40","date_gmt":"2016-02-15T12:40:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/debesyla.lt\/?p=7153"},"modified":"2021-01-31T13:22:21","modified_gmt":"2021-01-31T11:22:21","slug":"laiko-stebejimo-programos","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/debesyla.lt\/lv\/laika-uzskaites-programmas\/","title":{"rendered":"Kur iet mans laiks? Es izm\u0113\u0123in\u0101ju \u0161\u012bs divas lietotnes un redz\u0113ju\u2026<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kur pag\u0101ja tava diena?<\/strong> \u0160\u0137iet, tikl\u012bdz pa\u0146\u0113mi klausuli, pies\u0113dies pie datora, un, l\u016bk, jau ir tum\u0161s? M\u0113\u0123in\u0101sim kop\u012bgi rast atbildi.<\/p>\n

Jo, j\u0101, k\u0101 jau dro\u0161i vien saprat\u0101t - man pa\u0161am ir t\u0101da probl\u0113ma. \ud83d\ude42 Es izvirz\u012bju m\u0113nesi ilgu izaicin\u0101jumu sekojiet savam laikam tie\u0161saist\u0113... <\/strong>Un es atkl\u0101ju \u0161o un to vair\u0101k, nek\u0101 biju gaid\u012bjis.<\/p>\n

Es uzraudz\u012bju sevi tr\u012bs veidos:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. pa\u0161discipl\u012bna, 1<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. RescueTime un ManicTime lietotnes, 2<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Un p\u0113cnov\u0113ro\u0161anas anal\u012bzes metod\u0113. 3<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u013baujiet man past\u0101st\u012bt vair\u0101k.<\/p>\n

    [tcb-script] jQuery(function($){ $(window).scroll(function(e){ scrollTimeOut = true; if ($('#orodykle').length){ if($(window).scrollTop() + window.innerHeight > $('1TP6Pointer').offset().top) { setTimeout(function(){ $('1TP6Pointer').addClass('onscreen'); }, 750); } } }); } ); [\/tcb-script] <\/p>\n

    Tr\u012bs pa\u0161p\u0101rbaudes metodes, ko esmu izm\u0113\u0123in\u0101jis: L\u016bk, k\u0101 t\u0101s darbojas.<\/h2>\n

    1) <\/em>Pa\u0161discipl\u012bnas metode.<\/h3>\n

    \u0160\u012b ir visvienk\u0101r\u0161\u0101k\u0101 metode "Es tikai skat\u012b\u0161os pats". Nekas sare\u017e\u0123\u012bts. Un nek\u0101 efekt\u012bva. Neskatoties uz to, ka tas ir popul\u0101rs pa\u0161apm\u0101na veids.<\/p>\n

    T\u0101 k\u0101 pa\u0161discipl\u012bna darbojas tikai viena veida cilv\u0113kiem: <\/strong>kuri ir apguvu\u0161i pa\u0161saj\u016btas, medit\u0101cijas, l\u016bg\u0161anas, koncentr\u0113\u0161an\u0101s un emociju vad\u012bbas prasmes.<\/p>\n

    T\u0101pat k\u0101 videosp\u0113l\u0113, lai sp\u0113tu paman\u012bt, ko dar\u0101m, vispirms ir j\u0101apg\u016bst citas prasmes. Uzlabojiet savas nov\u0113ro\u0161anas prasmes 4<\/a> un nogalin\u0101t d\u0113monu Varok\u0101. 5<\/a> Vai ir pietiekami ilgs laiks, lai medit\u0113tu un ieg\u016btu psiholo\u0123iskas zin\u0101\u0161anas par sevi? Introspekcija nedarbojas, ja jums nav \u0161o prasmju. <\/p>\n

    Vai tad man ar to pietika? Vai tas str\u0101d\u0101ja? M\u0113\u0123ini uzmin\u0113t.<\/p>\n

    N\u0113, man neizdev\u0101s. <\/strong>Lai gan, tie\u0161\u0101m, es neko citu negaid\u012bju. Desmitiem rei\u017eu pr\u0101toju, kur mans laiks paiet, v\u0113roju sevi un p\u0113c dienas vai pusstundas aizmirsu, ko visp\u0101r daru. Ko gan citu skat\u012bties, ja internet\u0101 ir tik daudz video ar smiekl\u012bgiem ka\u0137iem?<\/p>\n

    T\u0101p\u0113c nebiju p\u0101rsteigts, kad p\u0113c m\u0113ne\u0161a, eksperimenta beig\u0101s, mana atbilde bija: \"Vai es kaut ko izdar\u012bju?\". 6<\/a><\/p>\n

    Un tas bija \u012bpa\u0161i redzams p\u0113c rezult\u0101ta p\u0101rbaudes, izmantojot otro metodi.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

    2)<\/em> Programmu RescueTime un ManicTime metode.<\/h3>\n

    Otr\u0101 metode izmeta varb\u016bt neuzticam\u0101ko formulas da\u013cu \u2013 mani. Jo man pat\u012bk melot ar\u012b sev.<\/strong> T\u0101pat k\u0101 tu.<\/p>\n

    ...Ne no \u013caunas gribas, vai ne!<\/p>\n

    M\u0113s esam izmesti tikai t\u0101p\u0113c, ka... Melot sev ir \u0113rti, pat\u012bkami un labi.<\/strong> Tas pat atvair\u0101s no psiholo\u0123isk\u0101m slim\u012bb\u0101m, novelkot vainu uz trasi "It's all over the place".<\/p>\n

    \u0160ie mazie meli mums pa\u0161iem ir iemesls, k\u0101p\u0113c "da\u017eas min\u016btes" paties\u012bb\u0101 ir pusstunda, ko m\u0113ra ar skrieno\u0161u pulksteni.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    T\u0101 ir m\u016bsu cilv\u0113cisk\u0101s izpratnes relativit\u0101te. Mums m\u016bsu darb\u012bbas \u0161\u0137iet maz\u0101k lielas, briesm\u012bgas un sliktas, nek\u0101 t\u0101s \u0161\u0137iet citiem cilv\u0113kiem vai paties\u012bb\u0101 ir. T\u0101p\u0113c v\u0113rot sevi pirmaj\u0101 \u2013 dabiskaj\u0101 \u2013 nov\u0113ro\u0161anas veid\u0101, neapg\u016bstot patiesas pa\u0161kontroles metodes, ir nepraktiski.<\/p>\n

    Es pieg\u0101d\u0101ju RescueTime<\/a> un ManicTime<\/a> lietotnes.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \u0160\u012bs ir divas vienk\u0101r\u0161as lietojumprogrammas, kas tiek saglab\u0101tas dator\u0101 vai t\u0101lrun\u012b un izseko, kur\u0101 log\u0101 pavad\u0101t laiku un ko tur dar\u0101t. Vi\u0146i neskat\u0101s caur videokameru un nep\u0101rbauda tavu e-pastu. pastkast\u012btes. Tie ieraksta tikai j\u016bsu pavad\u012bto laiku.<\/strong><\/p>\n

    T\u0101tad \u0161\u012bs lietotnes veic meh\u0101nisko pa\u0161p\u0101rbaudi j\u016bsu viet\u0101. Bez j\u016bsu iejauk\u0161an\u0101s un statistikas izpu\u0161\u0137o\u0161anas, kas: "Ak, man to \u013coti vajadz\u0113ja."<\/p>\n

    ...Vai \u0161\u012b metode man ir izdevusies?<\/p>\n

    J\u0101, izdev\u0101s! <\/strong>Sasod\u012bts, cik labi tas izdev\u0101s! Lab\u0101k nek\u0101 gaid\u012bju. Bet dodiet man tr\u012bs mirk\u013cus, lai pabeigtu tre\u0161o introspekcijas metodi, un es non\u0101k\u0161u pie rezult\u0101tiem, labi? \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n

    3)<\/em> Eksperimenta beigu anal\u012bzes metode.<\/h3>\n

    Eksperimenta s\u0101kum\u0101 es atz\u012bm\u0113ju, cik daudz esmu sasniedzis p\u0113d\u0113jo tr\u012bs m\u0113ne\u0161u laik\u0101. Darbavietas, prec\u012bzi, cik darba stundas nostr\u0101d\u0101ju. Beig\u0101s - tas, ko es sasniedzu m\u0113ne\u0161a laik\u0101, ar izseko\u0161anu.<\/p>\n

    ...Un tad es apr\u0113\u0137in\u0101ju, k\u0101 manas darb\u012bbas ir saist\u012btas ar cit\u0101m darb\u012bb\u0101m. un cik ilgi tas dro\u0161i vien pras\u012bja<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    Piem\u0113ram, ja es uzrakst\u012bju 2 rakstus, tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka man bija vajadz\u012bgs laiks, lai uzrakst\u012btu. Ja es izveidoju 11 ilustr\u0101cijas \u0161iem rakstiem, tad es pavad\u012bju atbilsto\u0161u laiku Photoshop. P\u0113c tam es pie\u0161\u0137\u012bru darb\u012bbas ilgumu atkar\u012bb\u0101 no katras aktivit\u0101tes sare\u017e\u0123\u012bt\u012bbas: piem\u0113ram, ilustr\u0101cijas izveide aiz\u0146em apm\u0113ram 20 min\u016btes, raksta uzmetums 2 stundas, \u0113\u0161ana 40 min\u016btes utt. Un p\u0113c reizin\u0101\u0161anas es par\u0113\u0137in\u0101ju, cik un kam tas man pras\u012bja.<\/p>\n

    Es sa\u0146\u0113mu garu Google lapu dokumentu, kur\u0101 m\u0113\u0123in\u0101ju atbild\u0113t uz diviem jaut\u0101jumiem:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Kam esmu velt\u012bjis laiku p\u0113d\u0113jo m\u0113ne\u0161u un \u0161\u012b m\u0113ne\u0161a laik\u0101 \u2013 ceru, ka \u0161aj\u0101 pa\u0161p\u0101rbaudes m\u0113nes\u012b nedar\u012b\u0161u neko sav\u0101d\u0101k, k\u0101 iepriek\u0161?<\/li>\n
    2. Un vai mans pa\u0161seko\u0161anas m\u0113nesis bija produkt\u012bv\u0101ks tikai izseko\u0161anas d\u0113\u013c?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      T\u0101 nebija zin\u0101tniska metode. Es tikai dom\u0101ju, ka var\u0113tu ieg\u016bt kaut ko noder\u012bgu no \u0161\u012bs pa\u0161tais\u012bt\u0101s introspekcijas tehnikas, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101, ka eksperimenta laik\u0101 tas neaiz\u0146\u0113ma nek\u0101du laiku - bija nepiecie\u0161ama tikai viena reize, lai sal\u012bdzin\u0101tu iepriek\u0161\u0113jo m\u0113ne\u0161u veicamos darbus kalend\u0101ra ierakstus ar pa\u0161reiz\u0113jo. .<\/p>\n

      ...Vai \u0161\u012b metode ir bijusi \u012bpa\u0161i noder\u012bga un par\u0101d\u012bjusi ko \u012bpa\u0161u?<\/p>\n

      <\/strong>N\u0113. Izr\u0101d\u0101s, ka mans m\u0113nesis darba zi\u0146\u0101 nebija \u012bpa\u0161s. <\/strong><\/strong>Bet tas bija \u013coti labi, jo man bija m\u0113r\u0137is p\u0101rbaud\u012bt "norm\u0101lu" m\u0113nesi vis\u0101 eksperiment\u0101, nevis kaut ko \u012bpa\u0161u. <\/strong><\/p>\n

      \u010cetri atkl\u0101jumi, ko es izdar\u012bju par saviem tie\u0161saistes paradumiem \u0161\u012b eksperimenta laik\u0101<\/h2>\n

      Pirmk\u0101rt:<\/em> Facebook aiz\u0146em daudz laika.<\/h3>\n

      Un es dom\u0101ju - \u013bOTI. Redzi, es pat rakstu ar lielo s\u0101kumburtu. Un, lai gan es ik p\u0113c da\u017e\u0101m stund\u0101m piesl\u0113dzos tikai uz 10 min\u016bt\u0113m... Apkopojot visu augusta m\u0113nesi, es izt\u0113r\u0113ju...<\/p>\n

      * Kosteli *<\/p>\n

      \u202637 stundas un mazliet. Tikai Facebook. L\u016bk, manas sejas izskats, kad ieraudz\u012bju \u0161o numuru:<\/p>\n

      \"\"<\/span><\/p>\n

      Es nesaprotu, k\u0101 tas ir iesp\u0113jams. \/\/ Vi Kontrimaites foto<\/p>\n

      Ko ar to dar\u012bt? Ko?! Izskat\u0101s, ka es neesmu Juste Latauskiene, kas raksta gar\u0101kos tekstus par \u0101rstu dz\u012bvi, un nerakstu anekdotes k\u0101 Jonass Jonka vai Robots L\u0101cis. Es pat saviem draugiem daudz nesekoju l\u012bdzi...<\/p>\n

      Bet statistika ir statistika.<\/p>\n

      Es pavad\u012bju 37 stundas jeb, rupji sakot, apm\u0113ram 16-20% no visa sava darba laika taj\u0101 m\u0113nes\u012b Facebook. Un es nepaman\u012bju. Galu gal\u0101, taj\u0101 laik\u0101 es var\u0113tu rakst\u012bt vai tikties ar draugiem, vai ne?<\/p>\n

      Otrk\u0101rt:<\/em> Video izklaide aiz\u0146em V\u0112L vair\u0101k laika.<\/h3>\n

      J\u0101. Saska\u0146\u0101 ar RescueTime un ManicTime datiem august\u0101 es pavad\u012bju... da\u017e\u0101dus Youtube videoklipus, TED sarunas, TV seri\u0101lus, multfilmas un anime un Imgur.<\/p>\n

      ...Aptuveni 72 stundas. Atkal, t\u012bri. Tas ir aptuveni 32% no kop\u0113j\u0101 m\u0113ne\u0161a darba laika. Ech.<\/p>\n

      Tre\u0161k\u0101rt:<\/em> M\u0101ko\u0146a raksta rakst\u012b\u0161ana, redi\u0123\u0113\u0161ana, ilustr\u0113\u0161ana un public\u0113\u0161ana aiz\u0146em apm\u0113ram miljonu stundu, k\u0101 es iepriek\u0161 dom\u0101ju.<\/h3>\n

      Nu, es to nedaudz pavairoju, paties\u012bb\u0101 es esmu august\u0101 Es uzrakst\u012bju vienu rakstu<\/a> un Es redi\u0123\u0113ju vienu<\/a>. Bet man vajadz\u0113ja k\u0101das 4 stundas, lai uzrakst\u012btu, redi\u0123\u0113tu 7<\/a> - apm\u0113ram 10 stundas. Apm\u0113ram 4-5 stundas pavad\u012bju ilustr\u0101cij\u0101m un v\u0113l 3 stundas maketam un format\u0113\u0161anai.<\/p>\n

      Neesmu p\u0101rliecin\u0101ts, vai tie ir norm\u0101li skait\u013ci. Varb\u016bt es vienk\u0101r\u0161i str\u0101d\u0101ju \u013coti l\u0113ni. Varb\u016bt es biju p\u0101r\u0101k izklaid\u0113jies. Varb\u016bt mana ga\u013c\u0113d\u0101ju di\u0113ta nav laba izv\u0113le un otr\u0101 raksta autoram ir taisn\u012bba... Hm.<\/p>\n

      Ceturtk\u0101rt:<\/em> e-pasts Pa pastu pavad\u012bju tik daudz laika, cik vien var\u0113ju.<\/h3>\n

      Vai prec\u012bz\u0101k - apm\u0113ram 15 stundas m\u0113nes\u012b, kas smuki sadala pusstundu katru dienu tr\u012bsdesmit dien\u0101s. Nemaz nav daudz.<\/p>\n

      Ta\u010du mani \u0161is cipars nep\u0101rsteidza, jo jau j\u016blij\u0101 biju sav\u0101 dator\u0101 uzst\u0101d\u012bjis programmu, kas ierobe\u017eoja laiku Gmail l\u012bdz tie\u0161i pusstundai dien\u0101. T\u0101 nu san\u0101k, ka es k\u0101 narkom\u0101ns esmu t\u0101ds, kur\u0161 lieto, kam\u0113r nedod. Varb\u016bt tas ir pozit\u012bvi?<\/p>\n

      Ko es dar\u012bju p\u0113c pa\u0161apr\u016bpes eksperimenta?<\/h2>\n

      Es to izdar\u012bju vienk\u0101r\u0161i: Esmu blo\u0137\u0113jis vai ierobe\u017eojis savas tie\u0161saistes aktivit\u0101tes, kas trauc\u0113 man sasniegt citus m\u0113r\u0137us.<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Lab\u0101ki m\u0113r\u0137i.<\/p>\n