Because, yes, as you probably already understood - I myself have such a problem. \ud83d\ude42 I set a month-long challenge track your time online\u2026 <\/strong>And I discovered this and that more than I expected.<\/p>\n I monitored myself in three ways:<\/p>\n Let me tell you more.<\/p>\n [tcb-script] jQuery(function($){ $(window).scroll(function(e){ scrollTimeOut = true; if ($('#orodykle').length){ if($(window).scrollTop() + window.innerHeight > $('1TP6Pointer').offset().top) { setTimeout(function(){ $('1TP6Pointer').addClass('onscreen'); }, 750); } } }); } ); [\/tcb-script] <\/p>\n This is the simplest "I'll just watch myself" method. Nothing complicated. And nothing effective. Despite the fact that this is a popular way of self-deception.<\/p>\n Because self-discipline only works for one type of person: <\/strong>who have mastered the skills of introspection, meditation, prayer, concentration and emotion management.<\/p>\n Just like in a video game, in order to be able to notice what we are doing, we first need to acquire other skills. Improve your observation skills 4<\/a> and kill the demon in Varok. 5<\/a> Is it long enough to meditate and gain psychological knowledge about yourself? Introspection doesn't work if you don't have these skills. <\/p>\n So was it enough for me? Did it work? Try to guess.<\/p>\n No, I didn't make it. <\/strong>Although, really, I didn't expect anything else. Tens of times I wondered where my time was going, I watched myself and after a day or half an hour I forgot what I was doing at all. What else is watching if there are so many videos with funny cats on the Internet?<\/p>\n So I wasn't surprised when a month later, at the end of the experiment, my answer was: "Er... Did I do something?". 6<\/a><\/p>\n And this was especially visible after checking the result using the second method.<\/p>\n The second method threw out perhaps the most unreliable part of the formula \u2013 me. Because I like to lie to myself too.<\/strong> Like you.<\/p>\n \u2026Not out of ill will, right!<\/p>\n We think we are just because\u2026 Lying to yourself is convenient, pleasant and good.<\/strong> It even fends off psychological illness by taking the blame down on the track "It's all over the place".<\/p>\n These little lies to ourselves are the reason why "a few minutes" is actually half an hour as measured by a running clock.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is all the relativity of our human understanding. To us, our actions seem less big, terrible and bad than they seem to other people or really are. Therefore, observing oneself in the first - natural - way of observation, without mastering the methods of true self-control, is impractical.<\/p>\n I deliver RescueTime<\/a> and ManicTime<\/a> apps.<\/strong><\/p>\n These are two simple applications that are saved on a computer or phone and track which window you spend time on and what you do there. They don't look through the video camera and check your e-mail. mailboxes. They only record the time you spend.<\/strong><\/p>\n So these apps do the mechanical introspection work for you. Without your intervention and embellishment of statistics that: "Oh, I really needed it."<\/p>\n \u2026Did this method work for me?<\/p>\n Yes, it worked! <\/strong>Damn, how well it worked! Better than I expected. But give me three moments to finish the third method of introspection and I'll get to the results, okay? \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n At the beginning of the experiment, I noted how much I had achieved in the last three months. Jobs, exact, how many working hours I worked. At the end - what I achieved in a month, with tracking.<\/p>\n ...And then I calculated how my activities are related to other activities and how long it probably took<\/strong>.<\/p>\n For example, if I wrote 2 articles, it means that I took some time to write. If I created 11 illustrations for those articles, then I spent a corresponding amount of time on Photoshop. Then I assigned durations to the activities based on the complexity of each activity: for example, creating an illustration takes about 20 minutes, drafting an article 2 hours, eating 40 minutes, and so on. And after multiplying, I calculated how much and for whom it took me.<\/p>\n I received a long Google sheets document where I tried to answer two questions:<\/p>\n It was not a scientific method. I just thought I'd get something useful out of this homemade introspection technique, given that it didn't take up any time during the experiment - it only took one time to compare the to-do calendar entries from previous months to the current one.<\/p>\n \u2026Was this method extremely useful and showed something special?<\/p>\n <\/strong>No. It turns out that my month, in terms of work, was not special. <\/strong><\/strong>But it was very good, because I aimed to check a "normal" month throughout the experiment, not something special. <\/strong><\/p>\n And I mean A LOT. You see, I even write in capital letters. And even though I only logged on to this social network for 10 minutes every few hours\u2026 In total for the whole of August, I spent\u2026<\/p>\n * Kosteli *<\/p>\n \u202637 hours and a bit. Facebook only. Here's the look on my face when I saw this number:<\/p>\n I don't understand how this is possible. \/\/ Photo by Vi Kontrimait\u0117<\/p>\n What is there to do in it? What?! It seems that I'm not some Just\u0117 Latauskien\u0117, who writes the longest texts about the life of doctors, and I don't write jokes like Jonas Jonka or Robotas Me\u0161ka. I don't even follow my friends very much...<\/p>\n But statistics are statistics.<\/p>\n I spent 37 hours, or, roughly speaking, about 16-20% of my entire working time that month on Facebook. And I didn't notice. After all, at that time I could be writing or meeting friends, right?<\/p>\n Yes. During the month of August, according to RescueTime and ManicTime, I spent various YouTube videos, TED talks, series, cartoons and anime and Imgur\u2026<\/p>\n \u2026About 72 hours. Again, purely. That's about 32% of a full month's work time. Eh.<\/p>\n Well, I multiply it a little, actually I am in August I wrote one article<\/a> and I edited one<\/a>. But it took me about 4 hours to write, to edit 7<\/a> - about 10 hours. I spent about 4-5 hours on the illustrations and another 3 hours on the layout and formatting.<\/p>\n I'm not sure if these are normal numbers. Maybe I was just working very slowly. Maybe I was too distracted. Maybe my carnivorous diet is not a good choice and the author of the second article is right\u2026 Hmm.<\/p>\n Or to be more precise - about 15 hours a month, which nicely divides half an hour every day in thirty days. Not much at all.<\/p>\n However, I was not surprised by this number, because already in July I had installed a program on my computer that limited the time in Gmail to exactly half an hour a day. So it turns out that as an addict, I'm one who uses until it gives. Maybe this is positive?<\/p>\n I did it simply: I have blocked or limited my online activities that interfered with my other goals.<\/strong><\/p>\n Better goals.<\/p>\n And so on. If there were more interfering activities, the same thing would happen to them.<\/p>\n \u200bHow did I do it? Helped me: Cold Turkey<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>and \u200bRescue Time<\/strong><\/a> <\/strong>\u200b(again!)\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b<\/p>\n These are small programs for your computer that will help you limit yourself to what you want. \u200bI spared no euros for these apps and it was worth it. By the way, Cold Turkey has a one-time fee, while Rescue Time has a monthly fee with a free trial period, so the first option is cheaper, but you can try the second one for nothing. I used both interchangeably. Of course, there was no need for both at the same time.<\/p>\n There are also alternatives that I have also tried:<\/p>\n They also work. Not so comfortable and high-quality, but it works. You can try it too if you want!<\/p>\n Good time! And don't forget to leave a comment below if you have any observations, tips or questions! \u23f0<\/p>\n\n
Three introspection techniques I've tried: Here's how they work.<\/h2>\n
1) <\/em>A method of self-discipline.<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/debesyla.lt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/rescue-time-ir-manic-time.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
<\/span><\/p>\n2)<\/em> The method of the RescueTime and ManicTime programs.<\/h3>\n
3)<\/em> End-of-experiment analysis method.<\/h3>\n
\n
Four discoveries I made about my online habits during this experiment<\/h2>\n
First of all:<\/em> Facebook takes up a lot of time.<\/h3>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/debesyla.lt\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/kas-per-sampunas.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
<\/span><\/p>\nSecondly:<\/em> Video entertainment takes EVEN more time.<\/h3>\n
Thirdly:<\/em> It takes about a million hours to write, edit, illustrate, and publish a Cloud article, as I previously thought.<\/h3>\n
Fourthly:<\/em> email I spent as much time as I could on the mail.<\/h3>\n
So what did I do after the introspection experiment?<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
And what would I advise you?<\/h2>\n
\n